HT: Jeremy, thanks for taking the time to be interviewed by 'The Homeopathic
Times'.
You are well known for your interest in Homeopathic philosophy, what
actually encouraged you to follow that route of focus?
JS:
When I originally studied Homoeopathy I didn't realise the depth of
philosophy possible, as most schools put the emphasis on materia medica
and cases. You can sometimes tell the type of Homoeopath by just by
asking which Homeopathic book they read first! For me it was Kent -
I just love his philosophy. I knew I loved it but I didn't realise there
was that much more to it until Joseph Reeves a teacher from Israel took
me 'up a potency' in that regard and allowed me to see how many possible
layers and levels you could delve into. I think this is what made me
focus on philosophy. I have also realised that knowledge of philosophy
is the main ingredient to becoming a competent homoeopath, material
medica is secondary. It is essential to understand what exactly what
is happening in each case, both in the long and short term.
HT: You mention you were taken 'up a potency' - could you tell us a
bit more about what this means?
JS:
'Potency' - this is how I see Homoeopathic learning. I see it as a process
of potentisation; there is a succussion and a dilution. The succussion
is 'up, down, bang, bang, bang', and developed through seeing cases,
reading materia medica, remembering data, looking at repertory etc.
Dilution then is an understanding, an 'Ah-ha!' realisation, a going
deeper and a broadening of knowledge. There has to be a good ratio between
the two of these - a certain amount of practical study / remembering
(succussion) and, once in a while, there has to come that 'Ah-ha!' realisation:
going deeper in to the knowledge (dilution).
Today,
when I meet a new group of Homoeopaths with the Dynamis School, I look
around and I see the 12cs, 30cs, 200cs, the occasional 1M. These potencies
are not better or worse, just steps along the way. What I want to achieve
is to slowly potentise everyone to 10M. Naturally, that happens in stages.
I often see the change around the 3rd weekend, an 'opening up' and I
see how the understanding of philosophy makes a difference to their
actual prescribing and case management. I have taught about 40 Dynamis
school courses and I know from the feedback I get that this process
works well.
HT:
Do you find that every time you teach something in particular in philosophy
that it changes?
JS:
Yes, it often does. Not really a change but an enhancement, a potentisation
of understanding. Quite a few people re-attend the course and find that
it has changed, partially due to their own change of point of view.
With every class I learn something new and it fills in the jigsaw a
bit more.
HT:
Jeremy, you studied both Chinese medicine and Homeopathy can you talk
a bit about the crossover for you.
JS:
I studied both at the same time but I was totally in love with Homeopathy
so that I didn't always give Chinese medicine my whole attention. It
was a full time school. I tried to find the crossovers and correlation
but it was difficult. I examined all sorts of avenues - 5 elements,
points, all sorts of things. Eventually, I went back to philosophy:
I found that the real connection between these two systems is in the
philosophy, not in the technical aspects.
In
the Dynamis School I use the Tao Te Ching as a textbook. It is the basis
of Chinese Medicine and when you study it, you can see there is a very
strong grounding for Homeopathy in the Taoist philosophy. If you translate
it into a practical way, you find Homeopathy as a system that follows
those principals.
The
other crossover is Chinese physiology and pathology because Homeopathy
doesn't have this. To some degree this is a slight advantage because
you are not looking for a diagnosis. The diagnosis is the remedy in
Homeopathy. Nevertheless, in some ways it is a disadvantage because
if we don't understand the pathology of the patient and are just going
by symptoms, you can totally miss out what is happening and choose the
wrong remedy.
Of
course, we do have an underlying mechanism in Western physiology and
pathology but I feel the Chinese method is more appropriate because
they are energetic not structural systems. Being energetic they fit
into our remedies and understanding of people. They really help in understanding
the processes and doing differential diagnosis, so I would recommend
people to study a bit of Chinese physiology.
HT:
Does analysis using the elements stem from here?
JS:
To a degree, and other systems. Consider a very hot case with palpitations
etc. From a Chinese perspective there are two reasons; either there
is too much yang like in Belladonna / Stramonium, or there is a yin
deficiency. In the latter instance there is an underlying weakness so
you may get what is called a 'false heat'. This looks very hot and full
but this comes from an underlying emptiness of the cooling system like
with Iodine. It looks hot and hurried and has fast consumption but,
unlike with Belladonna, this comes from an underlying weakness.
From
a symptom point of view if you only see heat symptoms it will look like
the same thing. However, if you can tell what is happening with the
patient these are totally not the same thing. In addition, from a Chinese
physiological point of view if you find out what this yin deficiency
is about or what brought it about - (it might be lack of sleep, too
much sex, from menstrual disorders or grief) this helps to identify
the cause of the symptoms. Piecing those things together therefore assists.
Furthermore, knowing then that in Chinese physiology the lungs and the
skin and colon are connected you can see the symptoms are part of one
thing. If, for example, a patient has asthma and then it moves to diarrhoea
this is two parts of one problem. Chinese physiology gives me a structure
to work within whereas in Homeopathy you only have Materia Medica to
work within.
HT:
What book would you suggest people read to get an overview?
JS:
There are many books on Chinese medicine the one usually recommended
is 'The Web that has no Weaver' by Ted Kapchuk. In Stephen Gascoigne's
books there is also good information as well as other modern textbooks
for Chinese medicine.
HT:
When you were going through the Taoist books did the link appear obvious
immediately or did it take a bit of thinking?
JS:
Both. For example when it says 'to make something shrink you must also
expand it' - that is the basic Homeopathic philosophy of the Law of
Similars. Likewise in saying 'that without substance can enter where
other things can not go' this is relevant to potentisation. Then, as
you go deeper there are more and more subtle levels to allow you to
understand. In the Dynamis School I ask people to read from the Tao
Te Ching and relate it to Homeopathy and when I read these observations
I learn.
HT:
Tell us a little about your approach to the miasms.
JS:
My approach is to study the 'Organon' and 'Chronic Disease' because
they are the source of the knowledge. There is a lot to learn from new
systems on miasms but I don't know if miasm is the correct word for
these. Miasm has a very precise definition for Hahnemann - he suggested
there were only 3 basic miasms (perhaps you can argue for the fourth,
cancer miasm). This besides, without reading these two texts it is difficult
to understand what miasms are about. Secondly, by using only vague psychological
characteristics of the miasm it can be confusing, so for example for
the syphilis miasm there really has to be some strong destructive characteristics
- both physically and psychologically - that go together with a syphilis
case.
HT:
On a very practical note, a lot of people have graduated from various
colleges around now - what would you say to them?
JS:
First of all congratulations for choosing the best profession in the
world and you are lucky people. The next thing is don't give up. If
you love Homeopathy and that is what you want to do then don't give
in. Conversely, some people may find they just love studying and they
don't want to practise and they don't lose out from purely studying.
There are many ways to enjoy Homeopathy without having to practise.
It
takes a while to build a practice and I am sure they have prepared for
that in college. In reality if a Homeopath sees a patient every 4 to
6 weeks they are going to need 6 or 12 times as many patients as an
osteopath, acupuncturist or chiropractor who sees the same patient once
or twice a week. This makes it difficult as some patients don't hang
around that long or they get better! So you do need to work at building
that practice and to make a living from it you must persevere through
the first 2 years.
You
have to be a bit proactive. Develop leads to send you patients, or maybe
find a place in a natural health clinic and give talks. When I started
I gave talks twice a week for 2 years to the rotary, the breast feeding
clinic etc - sometimes I'd give 10 talks and have no patients from them,
then sometimes 6 months later a patient may come. You never know when
you will get the golden patient that will send you a whole lot of other
patients!
Marketing
counts. Giving out business cards, advertising, writing articles in
a local paper and radio - all the things that I am sure you are taught
in college.
HT:
What about charging? Some people battle with that issue to start with?
JS:
It's something that is difficult for me so I can sympathise. I prefer
to get other people to do it for me if I can! But in the beginning you
can't do that so what helps is if you send a letter out to patients
when they book giving the time of their appointment, a map, things that
you need them to bring with them and outlining your fees. This way it
is nice and clear and you don't have to talk about it too much on the
spot.
Always
remember how much time and energy you are spending on every case and
study. Don't forget people are not paying you as a guarantee to getting
better. Rather they are paying for your time. Of course there can be
times where you may be treating a person for a year and they are still
not getting better then perhaps you decide not to charge them for a
while!
Finally,
make sure you book a follow up appointment there and then for the patient
and send out a reminder letter so that once the patients come you don't
lose them.
HT:
Thanks Jeremy for sharing your ideas and sizeable food for thought with
us. |